Advice
Why Most Communication Training Programs Are Teaching You to Talk Like a Robot (And What Actually Works)
Connect with us: SB Nation | Medium | Doodle or Die | The Elephant Journal | Pexels
Three weeks ago, I watched a room full of perfectly intelligent professionals practice "active listening" by nodding like bobbleheads and repeating back everything their partner said word-for-word. It was painful. The facilitator called it "breakthrough communication training." I called it expensive theatre.
After seventeen years of running communication workshops across Melbourne, Sydney, and Perth, I've developed some strong opinions about what actually works in workplace communication. And frankly, most of what passes for professional communication training these days is absolute rubbish.
The Problem with "Professional" Communication
Let me start with something that'll ruffle some feathers: teaching people to communicate "professionally" often means teaching them to communicate poorly.
Think about it. When was the last time you had a genuinely engaging conversation that followed the standard corporate communication formula? You know the one - opening pleasantries, structured agenda, bullet points, action items, closing summary. It's about as inspiring as watching paint dry on a government building.
The best communicators I know in business - and I'm talking about people who actually get results, who influence decisions, who build lasting relationships - they break half the rules we teach in traditional communication courses.
Take Richard Branson. The bloke built an empire by talking to people like they're actual humans, not corporate entities. Same with Gina Rinehart when she's in her element. They're not following some rigid communication framework they learned in a workshop.
What 87% of Communication Training Gets Wrong
Here's where most corporate communication skills training misses the mark entirely: it focuses on the mechanics instead of the magic.
They'll spend hours teaching you how to structure a presentation, how to maintain eye contact for exactly 3-5 seconds, how to use your hands in "open" gestures. But they never teach you how to actually connect with another human being.
I learned this the hard way about eight years ago. Had a client - big mining company up in WA - brought me in to fix their "communication issues." Spent two days teaching their management team all the textbook stuff. Perfect presentations, structured feedback models, conflict resolution frameworks.
Six months later, they called me back. The problems hadn't improved. If anything, people were more frustrated because now everyone was speaking in this weird, stilted corporate-speak.
That's when I realised I'd been teaching them to communicate like robots.
The Authenticity Factor (And Why It Terrifies HR Departments)
Real communication happens when people drop the performance and start being genuine. But this scares the living daylights out of most organisations because genuine means unpredictable. Genuine means someone might actually disagree. Or show emotion. Or - heaven forbid - admit they don't know something.
I've got news for you: your customers, your colleagues, your direct reports - they can spot fake sincerity from a kilometre away. They'd rather deal with someone who's authentically gruff than someone who's performatively pleasant.
This doesn't mean being rude or unprofessional. It means being real within professional boundaries.
The Three Things That Actually Matter
After nearly two decades of this work, I've boiled effective workplace communication down to three core elements that actually move the needle:
Clarity of Intent Most communication problems aren't about how you say something - they're about not knowing why you're saying it. Before you open your mouth, be crystal clear about what you're trying to achieve. Not what you're trying to say, but what you're trying to accomplish.
Emotional Intelligence (The Real Kind) Not the corporate buzzword version where everyone pretends to be perpetually upbeat. Real emotional intelligence means reading the room, adapting your approach, and sometimes knowing when to shut up and listen. It means recognising that your bad mood affects everyone around you, and that deadline pressure makes people hear criticism differently.
Genuine Curiosity This is the secret weapon most people miss entirely. When you're genuinely interested in understanding someone else's perspective - not just waiting for your turn to talk - the entire dynamic changes. Questions become exploratory instead of interrogative. Disagreements become problem-solving sessions instead of battles.
Why Most Workshops Miss the Point
Traditional communication training treats communication like a mechanical skill you can perfect through repetition. Like typing or data entry. But communication is organic, contextual, and deeply personal.
You can't script authenticity. You can't standardise genuine connection. And you definitely can't turn emotional intelligence into a checklist.
The best communicators I know are constantly adapting, reading situations, picking up on subtle cues that no training manual could ever capture. They've developed what I call "communication agility" - the ability to shift style, tone, and approach based on what the situation actually requires.
The Australian Advantage (And Why We're Wasting It)
Australians have a natural communication advantage that we're systematically training out of our workforce. We're direct without being harsh, informal without being unprofessional, and we have this brilliant ability to cut through nonsense.
But then we send people to communication training that teaches them to talk like they're reading from a script. We take these naturally engaging humans and turn them into corporate-speak robots.
I worked with a team leader from Brisbane last year - Sarah, brilliant engineer, natural problem-solver. Before the corporate communication training, her team loved working with her because she was straight-up, honest, and funny. After six months of "professional development," she was asking people about their weekends before every meeting and structuring every conversation like a performance review.
Her team started avoiding her.
The fix? We spent an afternoon unlearning half of what she'd been taught and rediscovering what made her effective in the first place.
What Actually Works in the Real World
Here's what I've learned actually improves workplace communication:
Story-based learning instead of role-playing People remember stories. They connect with real examples. Instead of practicing scripted scenarios, share real situations where communication made the difference. What went wrong? What worked? Why?
Context-specific coaching A conversation with your CFO about budget cuts requires different skills than a conversation with a frustrated customer. Generic communication training pretends one size fits all. It doesn't.
Permission to be human The most powerful communication breakthrough I see in workshops is when someone realises they don't have to be perfect. They can admit confusion, show concern, even express frustration - professionally and appropriately.
The Feedback Myth
While we're dismantling communication myths, let's talk about feedback. The corporate world has developed this bizarre obsession with structured feedback models. The sandwich method, the SBI framework, the growth mindset approach.
Here's the thing: most feedback isn't actually about helping someone improve. It's about the feedback giver feeling like they've done their job. Real feedback happens in the moment, when it's relevant, and when the relationship can handle it.
I've seen managers torture themselves trying to deliver feedback "correctly" while the actual issue gets lost in the methodology. Sometimes the most effective feedback is: "That presentation didn't land. Want to talk about why?"
Technology Is Making Us Worse at This
Email and Teams messages have given us permission to be lazy communicators. We fire off half-formed thoughts and expect others to fill in the gaps. We hide behind screens instead of having actual conversations.
But here's what really bothers me: we're using technology as an excuse to avoid the hard work of genuine communication. "I sent an email" has become the new "I tried to communicate."
The most effective teams I work with use technology to enhance communication, not replace it. They know when to pick up the phone, when to walk over to someone's desk, when to call a meeting instead of sending another bloody email chain.
Where to Go From Here
If you're stuck in communication-training hell - either as a participant or someone responsible for organising it - here's my advice:
Focus on real situations your people actually face. Skip the generic scenarios and work with actual challenges. Get people talking about what they struggle with, what they avoid, what keeps them up at night.
Make it about understanding, not performance. The goal isn't to sound professional; it's to be understood and to understand others.
And for heaven's sake, give people permission to be human beings instead of corporate avatars.
Communication isn't a skill you master and file away. It's an ongoing practice that requires attention, intention, and yes, sometimes failure. The best communicators I know are still learning, still adapting, still occasionally getting it wrong.
The Bottom Line
Most workplace communication training is solving the wrong problem. It's trying to standardise something that should be authentic, script something that should be spontaneous, and perfect something that should be human.
Real communication training helps people become better versions of themselves, not different people entirely.
After all these years, the most profound communication breakthrough I can offer is this: stop trying to communicate perfectly and start trying to communicate genuinely. The difference is everything.
Your colleagues will thank you for it. Your customers will notice. And you might actually enjoy talking to people again instead of performing at them.
That's worth more than any certificate of completion you'll ever frame.